Electroconvulsive Therapy Causes Permanent Amnesia And Cognitive Deficits, Prominent Researcher Admits
Category: ECT Information and News and ECT Effects and Statistics and Studies and Patient Info and Informed Consent
Electroconvulsive Therapy Causes Permanent Amnesia And Cognitive Deficits, Prominent Researcher Admits
Medical News Today
Dec 22 2006
In a stunning reversal, an article in the journal Neuropsychopharmacology in January 2007 by prominent researcher Harold Sackeim of Columbia University reveals that electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) causes permanent amnesia and permanent deficits in cognitive abilities, which affect individuals’ ability to function.
“This study provides the first evidence in a large, prospective sample that adverse cognitive effects can persist for an extended period, and that they characterize routine treatment with ECT in community settings,” the study notes.
For the past 25 years, ECT patients were told by Sackeim, the nation’s top ECT researcher, that the controversial treatment doesn’t cause permanent amnesia and, in fact, improves memory and increases intelligence. Psychologist Sackeim also taught a generation of ECT practitioners that permanent amnesia from ECT is so rare that it could not be studied. He asserted that most people who said the treatment erased years of memory were mentally ill and thus not credible.
The National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) estimates that more than 3 million people have received ECT over the past generation. “Those patients who reported permanent adverse effects on cognition have now had their experiences validated,” said Linda Andre, head of the Committee for Truth in Psychiatry, a national organization of ECT recipients.
Since the mid-1980s, Sackeim worked as a consultant to the ECT device manufacturer Mecta Corp. He never revealed his financial interest in ECT to NIMH, as required by federal law, and, until 2002, did not reveal it to New York officials as required by state law. Neuropsychopharmacology has endured negative publicity over its failure to disclose financial conflicts of journal authors, resulting in the editor’s resignation and a promise to disclose such conflicts in the future; yet there is no disclosure of Sackeim’s long-term relationship with Mecta, nor did Sackeim disclose his financial conflict when his NIMH grant was renewed to 2009 at approximately $500,000 per year.
The six-month study followed about 250 patients in New York City hospitals, an unusually large number; most ECT studies are based on 20 to 30 patients. Sackeim’s previously published studies were short term, making it impossible to assess long-term effects. “However, in other contexts over the years — court depositions, communications with mental health officials, and grant protocols — Sackeim has claimed to follow up patients for as long as five years. This raises serious questions as to how long he has actually known of the existence and prevalence of permanent amnesia and why it wasn’t revealed until now,” Andre said.
Besides finding that ECT routinely causes substantial and permanent amnesia, the study contradicts Sackeim’s oft-published statements that ECT increases intelligence and that patients who report permanent adverse effects are mentally ill.
“The study is a stunning self-repudiation of a 25-year career,” Andre said.
Added: Dec 22, 2006 4:01 pm | Trackback URI | Email This Post | Print


I had this treatment many years ago and the worry as to what it has done to my brain is the worst thing I carry. Are there any reassuring results? Can some people simply recover?
I am seeking reassuring answers to free me from the baggage of this.
Elaine
data…we need data….how many people have got permanent amnesia after recieving ECT??? over the period of 25 years how many people have shown side effects and how many have shown no side effects at all….numbers can prove it….because me, after doing so much research am still not able to make up my mind whether ECT is good or bad, should it be banned or not?? and i cant decide because there is no data!!!
I received this treatment 5 years ago and still suffer from not being able to remember or retain information just told to me, having to ask people to repeat themselves nearly every time. I thought I was alone, always hearing that ECT effects wore off. This is some assurance that I’m not losing more of my mind.
I received ECT treatement over thirty years ago after being told that it was safe, with only temporary side effects, and that it would help my depression.
To this day I have problems with retaining information. My long term memory is still excellent, but my short term memory is quickly overloaded and I lose information.
After my initial recovery, I went back to work as a payroll clerk and struggled with that although I had been previously a senior accounting clerk. I gradually worked my way back into accountancy but, even 15 years later, I suffered a stress burn-out largely because my memory-loss made it so difficult for me to do my work.
I remained out of the workforce until my retirement recently, working mainly in a domestic situation where my memory problems were not so much a hindrance.
Even today I struggle to accomplish tasks that require memory even though my memory tested out as in the top 98% of the population in a psychological test, twice. From having one of the best memories possible I have struggled for half my life with memory problems which can be traced to the ECT treatment that I received.
Depression is something that can be treated, that most people come out of eventually even without treatment. The adverse side effects of ECT are much more permanent and disabling than the depression. The remedy is definitely worse than the malady.
I hope that very soon this barbaric practice will be stopped totally, just as Frontal Lobotomy, another invasive and destructive ‘psychological’ procedure, has been.
My husband had ect treatments for his depression. It didn’t help his depression but it also left him with short term memory loss. We were told that the chances of that happpening were slim …WRONG!! He has lost all of his memory during the time he had them. Many important events occured during that time,birth of our first granchild(he was there and remembers nothing.)We thought that was going to be it then he started losing his short term memory. Needless to say,things only got worse after ect. I think they should be banned!!!
I was a final year vet student when I received ECT under section without my authority. I had a septicaemia at the time concurrently but none (sorry 1 did as he refused to sign but they just asked another psyche out of area who did)had the sense to realise I was feeling awful because i was prodromal for septicaemia (and had been in contact with leptospira) no one took bloods. they jumped for ect having given me largactil which led to me being zombified, well you should try it anyone with ME would be zombied by largactil. well I’ve had to contend with meomory dysfunction, word recall being wrong, there were traces of epilepsy on my brain scan after but not before, and the drugs gave me parkinsonian side effects. yes this is all true and not surprisingly i would rather see an acupuncturist next time. the treatment is barbaric, flawed scientifically, and seriously damaging. I have a knack of spotting people who have had the treatment without them telling me. Now they are suggesting it may be a personality disorder. It wasn’t anything like that before ECT. Quite possibly i have borderline contempt for pyschiatry personality dsorder realted to my distorted memory which makes life incredibly difficult at times, especially as my memory is returning at times 20 years later. I was unable to sue because I lcked the confidence to. Now i know that was a wrong decision. I should have done and made the headline if necessary. I will never get back all that bit of me that has been lost i suspect. A totally useless dangerous barbaric treatment. you only have to watch pigs being killed to realise it. And it hurt. they must’ve kept me low on anaesthesia because i was so ill. although the body doesn’t show anything in my head i was arching back back back and it was very very aversive. I would rather see an animal shot than electrocuted. There is no blood but the damge is there and all the more traumatic for not being visible. I would do anything i could to dissaude someone from this treatment. it doesn’t make any sense whatsoever. your brain isn’t functioning properly so we’ll damage it further and hope it makes it better. excuse me? what sort of argument is that? The drugs are bad enough. still perhas i should be rateful it wasn’t a frontal lobotomy.
Head injured by neurosurgeries in 1980. Damage sustained. Shocked into oblivion in Manhattan of NYC. 1982. Lies on all my papers as to the reason for admission.
1991 finally entered the Rusk Institute for rehabilitation. “Cognitive Remediation”. They told me if a lawsuit would ensue they would back me up. Even though a severe injustice was finally acknoweldged…a lawsuit never ensued.
Tested in 1996 by an independent place in Manhattan by neuropsychological testing. Diagnosed short term memory loss. Showed the doctor there my diagnosis from the Rusk Institute not far away…
My true injury which I keep on an index card and review often…
Rusk Institute from April 5th. 1992 to Dec. 8 1994.
Long term memory loss
Short term memory loss
Focusing what is said
Memory dejavu
Time and Place disorientation
Impaired insight and judgement
Distractibility
Emotional Gaiting
Hemiparesis right hand side.