USA Today Series
12-06-1995
Stunningly quick results often fade
Does shock therapy work?
Many psychiatrists and patients are supporters of shock therapy because of
the startlingly quick changes it usually produces.
Shock therapy lifts 70% to 95% of patients out of depression, according to
most studies. That compares favorably with the most popular
anti-depressants: Prozac (51%) and Zoloft (59%), according to a recent study
of those drugs.
And shock therapy often seems to work on people who don't respond to drugs.
It's also frequently used on high-risk patients - the elderly, those with
AIDS, multiple sclerosis, Alzheimer's, pregnancy, even heart transplants -
who should avoid anti-depressants because they could interact badly with
other medications.
But, unlike drugs, shock therapy's benefits fade quickly.
Researchers have been unable to document any anti-depressant effect from
shock that lasts longer than four weeks - a fact not disclosed to patients
in educational literature or consent forms.
The standard measure of shock therapy's effectiveness is the Hamilton
Depression Score. A severely depressed person would have a score of 30 or
more; a nondepressed person, less than 10.
If, after shock, the depression score goes down, the shock is judged a
success.
It's been proven repeatedly that shock therapy lowers the scores.
The American Psychiatric Association information sheet for patients says:
"We know ECT works: 80% to 90% of depressed people who receive it respond
favorably, making it the most effective treatment for severe depression.''
But the APA doesn't mention that this success disappears as quickly as it
comes.
Two controlled studies have been done to track how long shock's effect
lasts. The two studies compared depressed patients who were shocked with a
similar group who had "fake shock'' - given anesthesia and muscle relaxants
but not shocked.
The results:
In a 1980 study, shocked patients' depression scores were 26% lower than
patients who received fake shock.
But one month later, there was no difference in depression scores between
the two groups. A six-month follow-up also found no difference.
A 1984 study found shock patients were less depressed at two and four weeks
than those receiving fake shock. But there was no difference at 12 weeks or
28 weeks.
No study has addressed the subject since. Shock researchers now consider it
unethical to do studies with placebos (fake shock) on the grounds that it
would be withholding treatment from a sick patient.
Shock therapy is strongly recommended to help suicidal patients.
Electroconvulsive Therapy, the textbook written by the owner of shock
machine manufacturer Somatics Inc., says suicidal patients should be shocked
as the first treatment, before drugs or other therapies. And a suicide
threat is a common justification for giving forced shock to patients who
don't want it, under court order, according to University of Kansas
sociologist Carol Warren.
But the studies show shock therapy doesn't stop people from killing
themselves.
A 1986 study involving 1,494 patients found no difference in suicide rates
between shocked and non-shocked depressed patients. The study, published in
Convulsive Therapy, then reviewed all previous studies on shock and suicide.
"A close examination of the literature does not support the commonly held
belief that ECT exerts long-range protective effects against suicide,'' the
study concludes.
By Dennis Cauchon, USA TODAY
next article
|