Psychiatry’s Human Rights Violations - Handout in Toronto near APA meeting
Category: News
IN THE NAME OF MENTAL HEALTH - PSYCHIATRYS HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS
Note: Psychiatric survivors and supporters handed out many copies of this
leaflet on the street outside the Convention Centre in Toronto where the
American Psychiatric Association held its annual meeting in May 2006.
The American Psychiatric Association (APA) is holding its Annual Meeting in
Toronto on May 20-25, 2006. On May 26-27, a “Conference on Ethics in Mental
Health:” endorsed by the APA, is also being held Toronto. Since psychiatric
survivors have not been invited to speak at these conferences–with 1
exception of an unnamed “client” at the mental health conference–we feel
it’s appropriate to distribute this document as our contribution to public
education about many human rights violations in the psychiatry-dominated
“mental health system”. This is a short list of many of psychiatry’s
unethical practices or human rights violations minimized or denied by the
APA, the Canadian Psychiatric Association, and World Psychiatric
Association.
1. NO INFORMED CONSENT
The right to voluntary informed consent is enshrined in virtually all
mental health laws, it’s a key principle of medical ethics. This right
means that when prescribing any treatment or procedure, the physician must,
a., not use any pressure, threat or coercion to obtain consent; b., tell
you the nature of your condition or illness; c., inform you of the
immediate risks and other common risks of the treatment (”side effects”);
d., inform you of alternatives to the treatment; and e., inform you of your
right to refuse. Psychiatrists frequently violate this right - especially
when prescribing psychiatric drugs (”medication”) and electroshock (”ECT”).
2. FORCED DRUGGING
Psychiatrists frequently administer brain-disabling antidepressants and
neuroleptics and addictive tranquilizers (”medication”) without informed
consent of their patients. This is unlawful. Forced drugging is assault. In
fact, any “unwanted touching” constitutes assault in many criminal codes
including the Criminal Code of Canada. Many psychiatric survivors have been
traumatized and disabled (sometimes permanently) by forced drugging (e.g.
injections). Many more women than men are drugged; women diagnosed as
depressed, “bipolar” or suffering “postpartum depression” are the main
targets of this psychiatric assault.
3. ELECTROSHOCK ( “electroconvulsive therapy”/ECT”)
As one of the most disabling and inhumane procedures in psychiatry,
electroshock is increasingly used in several countries including Canada,
United States, and the UK. ECT’s immediate effects include seizure,
convulsion, coma, severe headache, disorientation, nausea, and physical
weakness. Its long-term effects include permanent memory loss, learning and
reading disabilities, impaired concentration, and brain damage. “ECT”
consent forms are a sham, since patients are misinformed or not informed of
most of these serious health risks. Women and the elderly, especially
elderly women, are the main targets. Electroshock is state-sanctioned
violence against women. Anti-shock campaigns advocating abolition are
growing in the United States (Texas, California), the United Kingdom, and
New Zealand. “ECT” should be universally and immediately banned
4. INVOLUNTARY COMMITTAL IS PREVENTIVE DETENTION
Involuntary committal is the psychiatric imprisonment of people labeled and
believed to be “mentally ill”, dangerous to themselves or others, and/or
“incapable”. Locking up citizens on the belief or opinion they might commit
a violent act or criminal offence - without being charged and denied a
trial - is preventive detention, which is prohibited in international law.
Many involuntary patients are poor or homeless, with little or no community
support. Although involuntary committal violates several rights in the
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (sections 7, 9,15), it is legal in
all provinces, all states in the United States and many European countries.
5. COMMUNITY TREATMENT ORDERS/OUTPATIENT FORCED DRUGGING -Under these
“leash laws”, psychiatrists have the power to force psychiatric patients to
be treated in the community - the treatment is usually powerful,
brain-damaging antidepressants and/or neuroleptics. If patients refuse to
obey community treatment orders (CTOs) or “take their meds” (sometimes
ordered by judges in the United States), they can be locked up again for
longer periods or indefinitely. These psychiatric orders are enforced by
community treatment teams of mental health professionals. In Ontario,
patient appeals are rarely successful; CTOs may soon be challenged as
Charter violations.
6. CHILD ABUSE -
Child psychiatrists frequently prescribe health-threatening antidepressants
and neuroleptics to young children (some as young as 2 or 3 years old) as a
treatment for “behavior disorder” or “mental illness”. Some researchers
have used children as guinea pigs in hi-risk drug experiments. In Canada
and the United States, hundreds of thousands of children have been
fraudulently diagnosed with the label attention deficit hyperactivity
disorder (ADHD) or oppositional defiant disorder (ODD), and prescribed
highly addictive stimulants like Ritalin.
The United States government’s national “teen screening” program targets
and tests youth suspected of being “mentally ill”. A similar program is
recommended in the current mental health report of the Canadian Senate
(”Out of the Shadows - Highlights and Recommendations”, 2006, p.19)
7. TORTURE: PHYSICAL RESTRAINTS/”SECLUSION”
Adults and children labeled “non-compliant” or “unmanageable” are
frequently subjected to 2-point, 4-point and sometimes 5-point restraints
ordered by psychiatrists. 2-pointx restraints involve tying both wrists or
ankles; 4-point restraints involve tying both wrists and ankles; 5-point
restraints consist of tying the person’s wrists, ankles and waist - very
similar to the shackles inflicted on prisoners in maximum security prisons.
Hundreds of patients have been seriously traumatized or died while
restrained (see “Deadly Restraint” series in The Hartford Courant). Many
have also languished in “seclusion”, a form of solitary confinement.
“Seclusion rooms” exist on virtually all psychiatric wards and hospitals.
Patients experience restraints and seclusion as cruel and degrading
punishment or torture. Physically and chemically restraining children is
child abuse - a serious violation of the UN Convention Against Torture and
the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child.
In April 2005, the Coalition Against Psychiatric Assault (CAPA), sponsored
four days of public hearings on the effects of psychiatric drugs and
electroshock Approximately 40 psychiatric survivors courageously testified
about many of these rights abuses and violations they personally
experienced. (see “Inquiry Into Psychiatry”: -
http://capa.oise.utoronto.ca).
We demand that governments immediately call public hearings into these
psychiatric abuses - human rights violations the American Psychiatric
Association and Canadian Psychiatric Association minimize or deny - in the
name of “mental health”.
Prepared by the OCAP Accessibility Committee
Toronto, May 20, 2006
Endorsed by the Coalition Against Psychiatric Assault
(CAPA), Mindfreedom International, Common Front Legal Collective,
Psychiatric Survivors and Allies
Added: Sep 16, 2006 11:04 am | Trackback URI | Email This Post | Print


Hi, good site. Im in New Zealand. Here the situation is bad - its all on the site above. In NZ there is no supreme law. In Canada there is the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. In NZ there is the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990. The Courts in NZ have no power to review and strike down primary legislation. However, there is an untested common law power.
The main piece of mental health legislation in NZ is the Mental Health (Compulsory Assessment and Treatment)Act 1992. It authorises forced drugging, ECT. My blog focuses on a particular section, which is s.122B(3)MHA. Pursuant to that subsection staff, or ‘a person … may use such force as is reasonably necessary in the circumstances’ to treat a ‘patient’. ( see www.stopforceddrugging.blogspot.com)
In Chinese mental hospitals the situation is also bad. I have seen people imprisioned at Guangji Hospital in Suzhou for a variety of “illnesses” including protesting in public and requesting a divorce.
“Treatment” involved involuntary DETENTION, refusal to allow patient to contact relatives or Embassy, verbal and physical assault, torture involving 5 point restraints for days on end, forced drugging (injection and medication administered through tube down nose), forced feeding, and a revolting number of other violations.
yes, but much of that happens not just in China but in the west. Of course atrocities have happened under communist systems as well, it is not a ‘uptopia’. However, that is no reason to single out a communist country like China, Cuba, Laos, or North Korea and criticise them.
So - called ‘democracy’ is itself a disguised fascism. New Zealand’s thin democracy is a classic example of that.
[STOP_FORCED_DRUGGING]
Zara, I agree that forced shock/drugging and other horrible things happen in western countries. God knows I’ve been witness to plenty of them.
However, I’ve only known of one forced shocking that could fall under the “political oppression” banner that took place in the US. That was the Paul Henri Thomas case.
I’ve lived under communism: the former Soviet Union under Brezhnev, and in the nation formerly known as Yugoslavia. (I’m an American by birth and currently live in the US)
There is absolutely no comparison between these types of governments.
I’ll stick up for American (or any) democracy any day. Until you’ve lived under a true dictator and the dismal, brutal way of life called communism, you have absolutely no idea how good you’ve got it.
You’re here with the ability to say anything you want. I’ve never seen anyone visit the site from any of the countries you mention, let alone speak their minds.
In fact, China is well known for blocking access to internet sites. North Korea….let’s be real. How many people there have electricity, let alone a computer and net access? Same with Cuba.
According to the Committee to Protect Journalists, here are the ten most censored countries:
(in order of severity, North Korea comes in number one)
1. North Korea
2. Burma
3. Turkmenistan
4. Equatorial Guinea
5. Libya
6. Eritrea
7. Cuba
8. Uzbekistan
9. Syria
10. Byelorussia
I’m not saying that communism is bad. I’m just saying that power is grossly abused at Guangji hospital in China. From what I’ve seen the torture is administered not for the medical benefit of the patient but for the political benefit of those that wish to control the patient’s behaviour. The psychological trauma caused by the “treatment” by far outweighs any good.
I quote one of the doctors there who said to a patient “Here is worse than prison, you have no rights at all here… I’ll leave you tied up for a week, a month, however long I like… I could say you’re sick or I could say you’re well, noone will question what I do”.
Hi Nickeroo & Juli. Now to communism. Firstly, communist is not a dictatorship or fascism. Many restrictions om free speech occur also in western democracies. Many forms of conduct are unlawful, yes, even in new zealand.
There remain criminal offences for sedition in new zealand ( sss. 80-85 Crimes Act 1961). There are many other offences here that restrict freedom of speech and are inconsistent with section 14 New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990.
The USA is famous for its atrocies, take for instance islamic disendents being held without trial at Guantanamo bay (in Cuba). Even the US Supreme Court declared that illegal. Then there is Vietnam, the list goes on.
When the USA wants to impose its tyranny on other sovereign nations like Iraq killing is accepted in the name of democracy - but in actual fact its hypocrisy. The most brutal killing machine ever created is democracy - all is justified in the name of liberty.
The USA has the worst track record for atrocities in the world. Just read Noam Chomsky’s books about the US, its all in there.
Democracy is a foul form of violence used and is used as a mask to commit vile acts eg. killing innocent civilians in Iraq. Although communism is not a perfect utopian system it is superior to the the western democracy. I do not need to live under a communist system to know this. Many in Cuba love Fidel and many hate him. Many people love Bush , and many hate his guts.
Many people criticise the USA and its governments without ever having lived there; it is not a necessary thing that a paerson must live there first, ‘before’ that can hold an opinion or belief, is it. Of course there will be people that have lived under communism that hate it, and then those who are for it. The same situation arises in the west with the western democracy.
You seem to view communism with a more rigorous standard than the west; why?
I studied Marxism etc. and law at university and I stand by it till the end.
on the blocking of internet sites you may be wrong Juli. My friend in Cienfuegos Cuba can get nearly all of the sites that I get in NZ. He has tested the internet capabilities dozens of times.
Even sites he thought would be banned he has been able to get.
If you want restrictions of free speech look at the west with its lies and hypocrisy.
I don’t know how I got dragged into this discussion on political systems. I don’t care about form of government, I just care about the malpractices of doctors and the damage I’ve seen it causing patients.
The only matters I’m concerned about is the welfare of patients at Guangji hospital where the standard of psychiatric care is so low it actually damages patients.
Nowhere should patient’s rights be abused like this. Nobody treating patients like this should be able to call themselves a doctor.
If other hospitals are also this bad, or worse, I feel it is the duty of the psychiatric community to pressurize hospitals to adopt higher standards of care and more ethical codes of practice.
have a look at the blog www.stopforceddrugging.blofgspot.com we were treated like scum
I disagree with all your opionions
I am a lady from Pakistan.i would like to say that the patient should not be forced to eat .he should not be forced to take a drug either.
little children should also not be forcefully fed by moms.yeah toddlers and infants may be forcefully drugged because obviously they wont have panadol on their own will..brightly coloured how ever it may be.
Hi
I am writing from New Zealand. This country has a truly appalling attitude towards people with mental health issues. It seeks to classify them in “little boxes” without any true evaluation or understanding of the person and it “forces your hands behind your back” if you are the parent or caregiver so that the “patient” can then be hospitalised (dehumanised and drugged up in their own “best interests”) against the wishes of the patient or the parent and without either knowing what they have “agreed to” (been forced into).
I am the mother of a son who has been truly brutalised by the mental health system in this country (NZ). Not only that - when I have tried to raise legal action against their behaviour (my son’s hospitalisation on 2 occasions) - they (the mental health system) lost all the files; just “could not find them/had no record of those events”).
This is a very frightening situation if you try to seek help for yourself or someone you love. You are putting your trust in their hands. They are abusing your trust and seeking to dumb down/annhiliate the true worth and existence and potential of the very person that you love and are seeking help for.
My son has been brutalised by this system, as have I (his mother). Ultimately, the mental health system in NZ exists for and about itself.
Well, we have moved on (my son and I). Because I never stopped fighting for him or believing in him, and I never stopped fighting “them”.
He is not the “drugged up schizophrenic vegetable with no life outside the mental health system” that they tried to talk he and myself into (AND they tried to turn son against mother and mother against son in order to maintain control).
My son (through my persistent love and conviction in him and verbalised by me to him day-by-day) has passed a year long course at tertiary level and is now working full-time and THE SADDEST THING TO ME STILL is the fact that he can’t believe he is managing to do this after the NZ mental health system told him how little he was capable of.
I would add to this - I am a humanist and a buddhist (throughout many years of contact and practice) and have no political affiliation whatsoever. And I DO believe that entering into political discussion and/or arenas (Zara) around mental health is entirely wrong.
And - no - I am not an old woman; just wise in my early forties with a son in his early twenties.
I would also add something very beautiful to this discussion. My son has no bitterness or ill to others, despite the treatment he has received. In fact, he has, since gaining an independent income, started sponsoring a child in Sri Lanka.
Because he is glad that he is well. And bitterness will never take you there.
I studied theology and psychology and i´m qualified as psychotherapist .So I know a lot. Because i´m sick (they say)my opinion as expert doesn´t count.
In there opinion I know nothing.But because I´had a psychosis, but it doesn´t mean that I lost my common sence. I´m an academic profesional!
They heavenly forced me to take antipsychotics. Why did they send me home after only 3 weeks if I was so servere ill that they need to force me those agents in my but?
I feel abused. It feels like a rape! I´m raped in the past so I know how it feels. They forced a needle in my body, in my but! Why not in an arm? It doesn´t like a normal hospital. it´s more like a prison.
The therapy was doing the dishes and colouring pictures or playing a bordgame. Grouptherapy was taking with a student nurse about the news! I thought, Are they kidding me?!
The only therapy you got is your medicine, real psychotherapy is not covered by the ensurrance, so you don´t get it. I can pay for it, but I don´t get it in the hospital.
I think the government will like to control the homeless and poor alcohol and drugaddicts and the other miserables ,poor dissidents, mental ill and wistle blowers without political power. They want to make them invissable and powerless. They want not to cure, they want control! It is not very streetwise to think that western countries respect always human rights!
I am from Switzerland and have recently moved to Canada.
I am appalled at what the “mental health” system has done to us all. I refused medication for years - and finally gave in at the insistence of a psychiatrist.
My parents have already thrown so much money at “therapy” that i don’t know where to turn. They unfortunately spent their money on classical psychoanalysis - which did nothing apart from make me see my problems more clearly and intensely. “Here is your problem, this is why you have your problem” is basically the take home message from this therapy. I had to stick with it because that therapist was the only person who believed that i shouldn’t be locked up and the key thrown away.
Right now, I am medicated and trying to get off it: but not one will help me get into therapy that is state-financed. I can’t go back to my parents, for they have spent even more money trying to send me to another country to make me happier. The insurances say that “if I’m that sick, I shouldn’t be in school” - when I am really trying my best to get through university with minimum therapeutic support.
It’s a dead-end. I wonder if the whole system is corrupt, and wonder why I am trying to become a psychologist. Will I ever be helped? And will I be able to help people in this strange system?
Time will tell… One thing is for sure, i will never accept drugs again. I’d prefer to be hooked on dirty street drugs - rather than take a chemical with unforseeable effects. No one stays on street drugs for life either - but they’re illegal. Why are psychiatric drugs legal?
p.s. there ARE empirically supported therapies out there.
But actually getting people to feel better is not as lucrative as drugging them. Then, you can drug them for averse reactions - adding another drug to their list, or switch around drugs “to see which one works” while making patients sicker and sicker.
It’s just plain sad. Is it all about money?
‘Is it all about money?’Thats a difficult question. Obviously thats a major component. Drug companies like Lily are out to make a profit, just like any business is. The drug industry is a multi-billion dollar industry.